Proof: Most Muslims Support Terrorism

What Muslims Really Think

It is wishful thinking and naivety at best and dangerous at worst to think that most Muslims are not a serious potential threat. It's not "just a few bad apples", it's the majority of the bunch and to deny that reality is beyond Polyana. The notion, "there is good in everyone: is a foolish cliche. 


The idea that criticism of Islam is comparable to homophobia, racial bigotry, misogyny, misandry, is offensive. Unlike the afore mentioned categories, Islam is a choice. What one choose to believe is a choice. Pretty simple huh. What Muslims choose to believe and the behaviors that result in those beliefs is what makes them to some people's way of thinking, dangerous and undesirable. 



What Muslims generally believe is not much of a subject for debate. They believe the teaching of Mohammad as per the Koran and they believe in Sharia law as per the Haddith. Most people of every other political stripe and religious belief and non-religious belief find a good share of the teaching of Mohammad and Sharia in conflict with humanity. 

Muslims want protections against any criticism of Islam. No religion deserves protection or rights. Protection and rights are for people and in some cases animals. Laws are for protecting people not the ideas of people. Islam is at best and idea and IMO a horrible idea. If a Muslim does not like me criticizing Islam he is welcome to present an opposing view but if he tries to stifle my expression or threatens violence I'll go 1776 on him. Americans fight, kill and die for freedom. 

Terrorism and What Muslims Think About it

ICM Poll: 20% of British Muslims sympathize with 7/7 bombers
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... in-UK.html 

NOP Research: 1 in 4 British Muslims say 7/7 bombings were justified
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/ ... 2011-04-06 
http://www.webcitation.org/5xkMGAEvY 

People-Press: 31% of Turks support suicide attacks against Westerners in Iraq.
http://people-press.org/report/206/a-ye ... r-iraq-war 

YNet: One third of Palestinians (32%) supported the slaughter of a Jewish family, including the children:
http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/2011/04/ ... fanticide/ 
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 51,00.html 

World Public Opinion: 61% of Egyptians approve of attacks on Americans
32% of Indonesians approve of attacks on Americans
41% of Pakistanis approve of attacks on Americans
38% of Moroccans approve of attacks on Americans
83% of Palestinians approve of some or most groups that attack Americans (only 14% oppose)
62% of Jordanians approve of some or most groups that attack Americans (21% oppose)
42% of Turks approve of some or most groups that attack Americans (45% oppose)
A minority of Muslims disagreed entirely with terror attacks on Americans:
(Egypt 34%; Indonesia 45%; Pakistan 33%)
About half of those opposed to attacking Americans were sympathetic with al-Qaeda’s attitude toward the U.S.
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/ ... 09_rpt.pdf 

Pew Research (2010): 55% of Jordanians have a positive view of Hezbollah
30% of Egyptians have a positive view of Hezbollah
45% of Nigerian Muslims have a positive view of Hezbollah (26% negative)
43% of Indonesians have a positive view of Hezbollah (30% negative)
http://pewglobal.org/2010/12/02/muslims ... hezbollah/ 

Pew Research (2010): 60% of Jordanians have a positive view of Hamas (34% negative).
49% of Egyptians have a positive view of Hamas (48% negative)
49% of Nigerian Muslims have a positive view of Hamas (25% negative)
39% of Indonesians have a positive view of Hamas (33% negative)
http://pewglobal.org/2010/12/02/muslims ... hezbollah/ 

Pew Research (2010): 15% of Indonesians believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified.
34% of Nigerian Muslims believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified.
http://pewglobal.org/2010/12/02/muslims ... hezbollah/ 
16% of young Muslims in Belgium state terrorism is "acceptable".
http://www.hln.be/hln/nl/1275/Islam/art ... baar.dhtml 

Populus Poll (2006): 12% of young Muslims in Britain (and 12% overall) believe that suicide attacks against civilians in Britain can be justified. 1 in 4 support suicide attacks against British troops.
http://www.populuslimited.com/pdf/2006_02_07_times.pdf 
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07 ... h-islamist 

Pew Research (2007): 26% of younger Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are justified.
35% of young Muslims in Britain believe suicide bombings are justified (24% overall).
42% of young Muslims in France believe suicide bombings are justified (35% overall).
22% of young Muslims in Germany believe suicide bombings are justified.(13% overall).
29% of young Muslims in Spain believe suicide bombings are justified.(25% overall).
http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/musli ... df#page=60 

Pew Research (2011): 8% of Muslims in America believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified (81% never).
28% of Egyptian Muslims believe suicide bombings are often or sometimes justified (38% never).
http://www.people-press.org/2011/08/30/ ... extremism/ 

Pew Research (2007): Muslim-Americans who identify more strongly with their religion are three times more likely to feel that suicide bombings are justified
http://pewresearch.org/assets/pdf/musli ... df#page=60 

ICM: 5% of Muslims in Britain tell pollsters they would not report a planned Islamic terror attack to authorities.
27% do not support the deportation of Islamic extremists preaching violence and hate.
http://www.scotsman.com/?id=1956912005 
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07 ... amist.html 

Federation of Student Islamic Societies: About 1 in 5 Muslim students in Britain (18%) would not report a fellow Muslim planning a terror attack.
http://www.fosis.org.uk/sac/FullReport.pdf 
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07 ... h-islamist 

ICM Poll: 25% of British Muslims disagree that a Muslim has an obligation to report terrorists to police.
http://www.icmresearch.co.uk/reviews/20 ... 0Nov04.asp 
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07 ... h-islamist 

Populus Poll (2006): 16% of British Muslims believe suicide attacks against Israelis are justified.
37% believe Jews in Britain are a "legitimate target".
http://www.populuslimited.com/pdf/2006_02_07_times.pdf 
http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2005/07 ... h-islamist 

Pew Research (2013): At least 1 in 4 Muslims do not reject violence against civilians (study did not distinguish between those who believe it is partially justified and never justified).
http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/T ... report.pdf 

Pew Research (2013): 15% of Muslims in Turkey support suicide bombings (also 11% in Kosovo, 26% in Malaysia and 26% in Bangladesh).
http://www.pewforum.org/uploadedFiles/T ... report.pdf 
PCPO (2014): 89% of Palestinians support Hamas and other terrorists firing rockets at Israeli civilians.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/08/poll- ... on-israely 

Pew Research (2013): Only 57% of Muslims worldwide disapprove of al-Qaeda. Only 51% disapprove of the Taliban. 13% support both groups and 1 in 4 refuse to say.
http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/09/10/mus ... st-groups/ 
BBC Radio (2015): 45% of British Muslims agree that clerics preaching violence against the West represent "mainstream Islam".
http://comres.co.uk/polls/bbc-radio-4-t ... slim-poll/ 

Palestinian Center for Political Research (2015): 74% of Palestinians support Hamas terror attacks.
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/193395 

Pew Research (2014): 47% of Bangladeshi Muslims says suicide bombings and violence are justified to "defend Islam". 1 in 4 believed the same in Tanzania and Egypt. 1 in 5 Muslims in the 'moderate' countries of Turkey and Malaysia.
http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/07/01/con ... ddle-east/ 

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 19% of Muslim-Americans say that violence is justified in order to make Sharia the law in the United States (66% disagree).
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/ ... l-Data.pdf 

The Polling Company CSP Poll (2015): 25% of Muslim-Americans say that violence against Americans in the United States is justified as part of the "global Jihad (64% disagree).
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/ ... g-Company- 
Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Topline-Poll-Data.pdf

The Sun (2015: Following Nov. 2015 attacks in Paris, 1 in 4 young Muslims in Britain (and 1 in 5 overall) said they sympathize with those who fight for ISIS.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/ne ... -poll.html 

See also: http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Muslim_Statistics_(Terrorism ) for further statistics on Islamic terror.

Prove There Isn't a God

Prove there isn't a God is what believers tell non believers to which the non believer says, you can't prove a negative and the burden of proof is on the person making the claim. The non believer is correct on both counts. That said I can prove that at least one God is a liar.

There is a debate among Christians regarding the divinity of Jesus Christ. This is for the ones who think that Jesus is/was God.

Sometimes Jesus would speak in parables but here he didn't when he said: And whatever you ask in my name, I will do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything of me in my name, I will do it. (John 14:13-14) Whether Jesus actually said that is a whole other thread and whether he actually existed is another topic as well.

It crystal clear that when Jesus supposedly said, " And whatever you ask in my name, I will do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you ask anything of me in my name, I will do it." in John 14:13-14 he was speaking literally so let's put that to the test.

Whatever Jesus? OK Jesus I want something BIG BIG BIG since you are promising to do whatever I ask with no caveats. Here is what I want. Right now cure all the sick and give everyone immortal pain free lives like you did for the angels. They didn't have to earn it did they Jesus? You have no excuses Jesus so don't try and weasel out of this. Keep your word Jesus and DO IT!





As you all can see, Jesus did NOT keep his word. People are still suffering and dying as you read this. What Jesus is said to have said, simply is not true s they only thing left to debate is whether Jesus actually said it and if he did not say then the Bible is unreliable at best. I mean, wouldn't God's "word" be error free.

I have proven that the God described in the Bible either doesn't exist or is a liar. You decide which. I cannot prove that God doesn't exist but I have proven that the God of Abraham is maybe a myth and if not a myth definitely a liar.

Knowing what you know now are you still going to worship this "god". Are you still going to trust the Bible?

Related: Jesus Lied A Lot

The Real Reason Lucifer Rebelled

FACT: Word has it that the next most powerful being next to God is Lucifer.

FACT: God is said to have created Lucifer.

FACT: Lucifer was God's favorite angel.

FACT: God is said to be all knowing.

FACT: As the story goes, Lucifer and 1/3 of the angels rebelled against God and a big war in heaven broke out.

The all knowing God had to have seen this rebellion coming. God caused the war in heaven.

FACT: As the story goes, Lucifer's motivation for rebelling was brought on by God ordering him to bow to Adam.

This doesn't make sense. Didn't the all knowing God know that Lucifer was a megalomaniac like him? God should have known that this would have rubbed Lucifer who by the way, Lucifer was God's favorite angel, the wrong way?



Perhaps Lucifer rebelled for honorable reasons? Let's look at the facts. Lucifer is nearly as intelligent and as powerful as God his creator. Was Lucifer's ego greater than his intellect? Not likely but pride, jealousy and ego are the reasons given for Lucifer's tiff with God but this makes no sense. What did Lucifer have to envy? Adam was mortal and he and Eve were thought slaves to God. They were nothing more than God's pets to torture and confound. God knew that and so did Lucifer, after all Lucifer is the next closest thing to God.



Perhaps knowing the plight of humankind and knowing all the suffering humans would endure Lucifer said, "Enough is enough!" and decided to do something about it. Perhaps Lucifer was an animal lover and saw a future of animals suffering and dying in God's system of predator and prey and kill or be killed model? Animals did nothing wrong yet God saw fit to give them the same biting maladies that he had planned to inflict upon humans for being "tricked" by a talking snake? If you think about it logically it pretty much looks like Lucifer and his angels are not only good guys but are heroic figures. They were outnumbered and outgunned yet they fought the good fight. This is a bit like soldiers from the Northern states sacrificing their lives to free people that they didn't even know and by the way, the slave owner used the Bible to justify slavery and all its cruelty and injustice. Lucifer and his legions were even more courageous than the Union soldiers because they had their immortality to lose and their chances of victory were slim and none.



As the story goes, humans will be tortured in hell or destroyed for not believing in Jesus, yet Lucifer and 1/3 of all the angels set out to kill God, and Lucifer and his angels were assigned the task of punishing the wicked and non believers in hell for all eternity. As the story goes God loves his children; but clearly he plays favorites. He gave all his angels blissful lives unearned while setting the bar unreasonably high for his other children and punishes ALL all of them for a mistake by two people, Adam and Eve and BTW, Eve was framed.

Maybe, just maybe, Lucifer is the good guy. Sounds like it to me.👿

God Loves Doctors and Big Pharma

God loves it when people suffer. That is one way he gets people to pray for him. He tortures them with all sorts of cruel maladies. God has help and his helpers are members of the medical industry. A lot of people think that the letters MD mean Medical Doctor. Physicians believe that MD means Me Deity because they believe that they are God but in fact they are God's little helpers.



Doctors Earn $3.5 Billion in Kickbacks from Pharmaceutical Companies - See more at: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/doctors-earn-3-5-billion-in-kickbacks-from-pharmaceutical-companies/#sthash.7rEA5vvO.dpuf



AND... what does it say on American currency? There you have it!

Prince Dead

The singer songwriter, musician, actor and rock star Prince is dead at age 57. At this point the cause of death is unknown but has been reported Prince was suffering from the flu. In America people rarely die of the flu. The following is speculation.

Usually what a rich celebrity dies there are usually doctors and their poisons involved. Doctors killed, Anna Nicole Smith, Whitney Houston, Michael Jackson, Joan Rivers, Heath Ledger ect... I suspect that Prince was killed in part by a drug called Tamiflu.

Prince's doctor prescribed oxycodone under friend's name days before ...

Tamiflu is given to people who have flu symptoms and it's effectiveness is questionable. Tamiflu is a very very expensive and dangerous drug which should never have been approved by the FDA. Don't just take my word for it. Here is what patients with no ax to grind are saying about Tamiflu.

List of celebrities killed by pharmaceutical drugs.

UPDATE: The semi official word is, Prince took an overdose of the pain drug Percocet. It looks like the media is going to try to portray Prince as a junkie. I doubt if he was a junkie but what I do know is that Prince was a victim of failed hip surgery in 2010 and that is why he was prescribed Percocet. Percocet is the brand name of the drug Oxycodone. Oxycodone is a combination of Oxycodone Hyrdrochloride and Tylenol. The Tylenol may have been what killed him. First off, Tylenol does nothing to reduce pain but is will destroy your liver. Chances are Prince's liver was compromised and therefore unable to process the Percocet.



Doctors failed Prince. They fucked up his surgery and they fucked up his pain management. This sort of stuff is typical when MDs are involved. Chalk up another hit for the White Coat Mafia.

Who Owns The Star Spangled Banner?

Leave it to the scumbag corporate gangsters to steal the Star Spangled Banner and profit from it. Call me a crazy liberal but I for one hold our the national anthem sacred and believe it belongs to the people of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.... NO EXCEPTIONS!! 



NO ONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO PROFIT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM FROM THE STAR SPANGLED BANNER... PERIOD! ANYONE WHO DOES IS A FUCKING TRAITOR!

My shock is not that great because the corporations and the criminal elite also have made the Constitution and its Bill of Rights mostly null and void. Will the next step be them owning design patents on Old Glory?

IMO any proceeds from the Star Spangled Banner should go to the American people or the descendants of Francis Scott Key and the people of England because the tune was originally an English drinking song. 
Censoring the National Anthem for Copyright Violation


Performing rights: These are held by (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC etc.) as registered by the publisher. These organizations reserve the right to act on behalf of the publisher to obtain monies from the performance or broadcast of a sound recording. 

Mechanical rights: These are held by the person or persons who's performance was recorded (i.e. vocalist, intrumentalist, comedian etc.) 

Copyright: These are held by anyone that had anything to do with the creative work that was recorded. (i. e. composer, lyricist, arranger etc.) 

Publishing rights: These are the intellectual property rights to the sound recording that can be bought or sold to parties that may or may not have anything to do with the recording. The owner of these rights have control of where and how the recording is obtained or broadcast. 


Television and radio stations stopped using the Star Spangled Banner when they signed off the air because if they used it they would have to pay royalties so they stopped using it.

Any time the anthem is sung at an NFL game, recorded by NFL engineers and broadcast during NFL TV time, the mechanicals, publishing, and performance rights belong to the NFL for that specific performance even if the song was originally written and recorded by U2 or Green Day. If it is sung at an NBA or MLB game, those respective organizations control the same rights. 

Imagine: The NFL owns the rights to Whitney Houston's version of the Star-Spangled Banner while MLB owns the rights to Rosanne Barr's version!

North Carolina's Anti LGBT Law

At the end of this video is an explanation of the NC anti GLBT law.


The CCC's Conservative Christian Cocksuckers aka Conservative Christian Koch Suckers in North Carolina passed an unconstitutional law that among other things prevents transgender folks from using public restrooms.  The law passed by the General Assembly and signed that same night by Gov. Pat McCrory goes further than a narrow elimination of Charlotte’s ordinance, which had generated the most controversy by a change that protected transgender people who use public restrooms based on their gender identity. The new law also nullified local ordinances around the state that would have expanded protections for the LGBT community.

The state has long had laws regulating workplace discrimination, use of public accommodations, minimum wage standards and other business issues. The new law – known as HB2, the Charlotte bathroom bill or, more officially, as the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act – makes it illegal for cities to expand upon those state laws, as more than a dozen cities had done including Charlotte, Raleigh, Chapel Hill and Durham. 

The CCC's Conservative Christian Cocksuckers constantly whine about state rights but apparently they don't care about the rights of counties, towns and municipalities let alone the US Constitution. 

Please take the time to contact these Bible Banging Koch whores and give them a piece of your mind by contacting Who Represents Me?   Other filthy red states are trying the same fascist antics. Let's stop this sort of theocratic evil in North Carolina before it spreads.

Take the time to sign this petition and share it. Tell criminal Pat McCrory and his Koch owned Rethuglicans to repeal this illegal and immoral law. 

Work hard to put trash like Pat McCrory and his thugs in the   North Carolina General Assembly out of government for good. 

Read more here: http://www.cha

rlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article68401147.html#storylink=cpy

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article68401147.html#storylink=cpy